Google Forms collects the answers. Eneya reads all of them.

A questionnaire tool for the step before the interview. You write questions for a role, send each candidate a private link, and they answer in writing. Eneya scores every answer against the competencies you defined and hands you a report. That's the whole product.

No, and it's not trying to become one. Eneya covers one step. Whatever you use to track applications, you keep using it.

Nothing on the candidate's side. They still get a link, still type their answers, still do it whenever suits them. What changes is what happens after they hit submit. A form hands you two hundred rows of text, and the honest truth is that row one hundred and eighty never gets read as carefully as row three. Eneya scores every set against the competencies you wrote the questions for, shows the working behind each score, and tells you whether the answers name anything you could actually check. You also see who answered and who you have already reviewed. And candidate answers are deleted automatically at the end of the process, instead of living in a spreadsheet on your Drive for the next four years. The longer version, including where a form builder or an ATS would serve you better, is on the Google Forms alternative page.

Because writing is lighter on everyone. Candidates answer on any device without booking a slot or recording themselves, so more of them actually finish. You read a report in minutes instead of watching half an hour of video. And a written answer leaves something a call does not: the specifics are on the page, in the candidate's own words, and they are still there when you compare two people a week later.

Any role where you'd otherwise find out on the call. Sales, support, operations, finance, engineering. You write the questions, so the questionnaire is exactly as specific as the role needs.

Candidate answers and evaluation reports are kept only for a limited period tied to your hiring process, and deleted automatically afterward, whether or not a decision was made. Full details, including exact timeframes, are in our Privacy Policy.

Eneya runs on EU infrastructure in Frankfurt and keeps candidate data only as long as your hiring process needs it, with automatic deletion after that. A Data Processing Agreement under Art. 28 GDPR is published and forms part of our Terms, including the full list of subprocessors, so there is nothing to negotiate before you start.

No. It scores written answers against the competencies you defined and shows you the breakdown. Every hiring decision is made by a person. Eneya doesn't interview anyone and doesn't make calls on its own.

The model evaluates each answer against your competencies and reports what it found. The final score is then computed from those assessments by a fixed rule in our code, not by the model itself, and every report shows the breakdown, so you can always see where a number came from. Each stored evaluation also keeps the exact version of the rule it was scored with.

Many will, and that is not the problem. A candidate writing with an assistant from their own notes produces true answers in their own words, and no tool can tell that text from typed text. What Eneya checks instead is whether the answers give you anything to verify: a named company, product or project with details that only make sense there. A set with nothing named gets a Medium reading and a plain suggestion to ask which company it was. Answers that disagree with each other become questions for the call. Time per question and pasted text are shown as facts about how the form was filled in, and they do not affect the score, the verdict or the reading.

No. Each candidate gets a private link and answers directly. No account, no download, nothing to install.